The Finals
"Thevenin's Theorem"
Thevenin's Theorem states that it is possible to simplify any linear circuit, no matter how complex, to an equivalent circuit with just a single voltage source and series resistance connected to a load. The qualification of “linear” is identical to that found in the Superposition Theorem, where all the underlying equations must be linear (no exponents or roots). If we're dealing with passive components (such as resistors, and later, inductors and capacitors), this is true. However, there are some components (especially certain gas-discharge and semiconductor components) which are nonlinear: that is, their opposition to current changes with voltage and/or current. As such, we would call circuits containing these types of components, nonlinear circuits.
Thevenin's Theorem is especially useful in analyzing power systems and other circuits where one particular resistor in the circuit (called the “load” resistor) is subject to change, and re-calculation of the circuit is necessary with each trial value of load resistance, to determine voltage across it and current through it.
Thevenin Equivalent Circuit
Any two-terminal linear network, composed of voltage sources, current sources, and resistors, can be replaced by an equivalent two-terminal
network consisting of an independent voltage source in series with a resistor.
Thevenin Equivalent Circuit Any two-terminal linear network, composed of voltage sources, current sources, and resistors, can be replaced by an equivalent two-terminal network consisting of an independent voltage source in series with a resistor.
Steps to follow for thevenin's Theorem
- (1) Find the Thevenin source voltage by removing the load resistor from the original circuit and calculating voltage across the open connection points where the load resistor used to be.
- (2) Find the Thevenin resistance by removing all power sources in the original circuit (voltage sources shorted and current sources open) and calculating total resistance between the open connection points.
- (3) Draw the Thevenin equivalent circuit, with the Thevenin voltage source in series with the Thevenin resistance. The load resistor re-attaches between the two open points of the equivalent circuit.
- (4) Analyze voltage and current for the load resistor following the rules for series circuits.
"Norton's Theorem"
Norton's theorem states that a network consists of several voltage sources, current sources and resistors with two terminals, is electrically equivalent to an ideal current source " INO" and a single parallel resistor, RNO. The theorem can be applied to both A.C and D.C cases. The Norton equivalent of a circuit consists of an ideal current source in parallel with an ideal impedance (or resistor for non-reactive circuits).
The Norton equivalent circuit is a current source with current "INO" in parallel with a resistance RNO.To find its Norton equivalent circuit,
- Find the Norton current "INO". Calculate the output current, "IAB", when a short circuit is the load (meaning 0 resistances between A and B). This is INo.
- Find the Norton resistance RNo. When there are no dependent sources (i.e., all current and voltage sources are independent), there are two methods of determining the Norton impedance RNo.
- Calculate the output voltage, VAB, when in open circuit condition (i.e., no load resistor — meaning infinite load resistance). RNo equals this VAB divided by INo.
or
- Replace independent voltage sources with short circuits and independent current sources with open circuits. The total resistance across the output port is the Norton impedance RNo.
However, when there are dependent sources the more general method must be used. This method is not shown below in the diagrams.
- Connect a constant current source at the output terminals of the circuit with a value of 1 Ampere and calculate the voltage at its terminals. The quotient of this voltage divided by the 1 A current is the Norton impedance RNo. This method must be used if the circuit contains dependent sources, but it can be used in all cases even when there are no dependent sources.
Example 1:-
Consider this circuit-
To find the Norton’s equivalent of the above circuit we firstly have to remove the centre 40Ω load resistor and short out the terminals A and B to give us the following circuit.
When the terminals A and B are shorted together the two resistors are connected in parallel across their two respective voltage sources and the currents flowing through each resistor as well as the total short circuit current can now be calculated as:
With A-B Shorted :
If we short-out the two voltage sources and open circuit terminals A and B, the two resistors are now effectively connected together in parallel. The value of the internal resistor Rs is found by calculating the total resistance at the terminals A and B giving us the following circuit.
Find the Equivalent Resistance (Rs):
10Ω Resistor in parallel with the 20Ω Resistor
Having found both the short circuit current, Is and equivalent internal resistance, Rs this then gives us the following Nortons equivalent circuit.
Nortons equivalent circuit.
Ok, so far so good, but we now have to solve with the original 40Ω load resistor connected across terminals A and B as shown below.
Again, the two resistors are connected in parallel across the terminals A and B which gives us a total resistance of:
The voltage across the terminals A and B with the load resistor connected is given as:
Then the current flowing in the 40Ω load resistor can be found as:
Steps to follow for Norton's Theorem
- (1) Find the Norton source current by removing the load resistor from the original circuit and calculating current through a short (wire) jumping across the open connection points where the load resistor used to be.
- (2) Find the Norton resistance by removing all power sources in the original circuit (voltage sources shorted and current sources open) and calculating total resistance between the open connection points.
- (3) Draw the Norton equivalent circuit, with the Norton current source in parallel with the Norton resistance. The load resistor re-attaches between the two open points of the equivalent circuit.
- (4) Analyze voltage and current for the load resistor following the rules for parallel circuits.
Learnings:
1.Norton's theorem and Thevenin's theorem are equivalent,and the equivalence leads to source transformation in electrical circuits.
2.For an electric-circuit,the equivalence is given by VTh= Ith x Rth ie Thevenin's volage=Norton's current x Thevenin's resistance.
3.The applications of Norton theorem is similar to that of Thevenin's theorem.The main application is nothing but the simplification of electrical circuit by introducing source transoformation.
Maximum Power Transfer Theorem
Suppose we have a voltage source or battery that's internal resistance is Ri and a load resistance RL is connected across this battery . Maximum power transfer theoremdetermines the value of resistance RL for which, the maximum power will be transferred from source to it. Actually the maximum power, drawn from the source, depends upon the value of the load resistance. There may be some confusion let us clear it.
Power delivered to the load resistance,
To find the maximum power, differentiate the above expression with respect to resistance RLand equate it to zero. Thus,
Thus in this case, the maximum power will be transferred to the load when load resistance is just equal to internal resistance of the battery .
Maximum power transfer theorem can be applicable in complex network as follows-
A resistive load in a resistive network will abstract maximum power when the load resistance is equal to the resistance viewed by the load as it looks back to the network. Actually this is nothing but the resistance presented to the output terminals of the network. This is actually Thevenin equivalent resistance as we explained in Thevenin's theorem if we consider the whole network as a voltage source.
Learnings:
- The Maximum Power Transfer Theorem states that the maximum amount of power will be dissipated by a load resistance if it is equal to the Thevenin or Norton resistance of the network supplying power.
- The Maximum Power Transfer Theorem does not satisfy the goal of maximum efficiency.
Capacitors and Inductors
It is fairly simple to understand what happens when we apply a signal to a resistance. This is because resistance obeys Ohm's Law. However, the behaviour of Capacitors and Inductors is rather more complicated. Fortunately, we can use complex numbers and the concept of Reactance to help us understand and analyse what happens when we apply signals to circuits which contain capacitors and/or resistors.
Reactance of a Capacitor.
Consider first what happens when we apply sinewave voltage to a capacitor.
We can represent the voltage applied to the capacitor as a complex quantity
although only the real part of this is 'visible', of course.
The current flowing 'through' the capacitor (i.e. the rate at which we have to remove charge from one plate and put it onto the other) is proportional to how quickly we are changing the voltage at any instant. We can (as in the 'First 11' section of this guide) therefore use a form of differential calculus to analyse what is happening. Here, instead, we'll just say that the Capacitor's behaviour can be defined in terms of a Reactance, XC, whose value is
Where C is the capacitance value (in Farads) and f is the frequency of the wave we're applying.
To work out the current we can now use this in exactly the same way as we'd use the resistance of a resistor. Hence we can say that the current will be given by
Looking at this we can see that the 'j' which made it 'imaginary' has meant that the real (i.e. 'visible') part of the current is the Sin function, when the real part of the applied voltage is the Cos function. Hence we have a current which is out of step (by 90 degrees) with the applied voltage. This is the result we'd expect from using differential calculus since we want the peaks of the current waveform to occur when the voltage is changing most swiftly (when it is passing though zero). Note also that the magnitude of the current depends on the signal frequency. This is what we'd expect as a higher frequency means the voltage will have to change more rapidly.
Reactance of an Inductor
We can define the behaviour of an inductor in a similar way. In this case it is the rate of change of the current which is proportional to the applied voltage. So when we apply a voltage VL which is exactly the same as the VC we used earlier we get the behaviour shown in the diagram below.
To describe this behaviour can say that the reactance of the inductor, XL, will be
where L is the inductance value in Henries.
As a result we get a current of
Comparing this result with the capacitor we can see that in both cases an input cosine voltage waveform produces a sine wave current variation, but the signs of the currents produced are different. Because of this the current through the capacitor is said to lead the applied voltage, and that through the inductor is said to lag the applied voltage. We can see why these terms are used by looking at the waveforms in the above diagrams which show the sorts of patterns we'd see using an oscilloscope. The difference arises because the capacitor reactance contains a '1/j' whereas the inductor reactance has a 'j'. As a result, when we divide the voltage by the reactance this means we get a 'jj = -1' for the sine term when using a capacitor and a 'j/j = 1' for the sine term when using an inductor. The terms, 'lead' and 'lag' are used generally to indicate the 'sign' of the reactance of a circuit (i.e. capacitive or inductive).